What 100+ L&D Respondents Told Us
Voice of the L&D community
We asked 100+ learning and development professionals what is working, what is broken, and what they want from AI. Here is what they reported — and what to do about it.
Who we heard from
Respondents included instructional designers, training managers, and learning leaders across education and enterprise. Their answers are self-reported and directional, but the patterns are consistent: teams want to spend less time fighting authoring tools and more time creating learning that sticks.
What they said is working
- AI assistance for first drafts saves real time when content is grounded in trusted sources.
- Interactive activities outperform static slides on engagement.
- Reusing and converting existing material — like turning a PDF into an interactive course — beats starting from scratch.
What they said is broken
- Traditional authoring workflows are slow and hard to update.
- AI that hallucinates erodes trust and creates rework.
- Authoring, delivery, and analytics live in disconnected tools.
- Privacy and compliance questions stall wider AI rollout.
How Mexty V3 responds
Mexty answers each concern directly: vibe coding for interactive learning replaces complex authoring workflows; Source of Truth governance grounds AI in your knowledge bases to limit hallucinations; built-in LMS capabilities connect authoring, delivery, and analytics in one workflow; and as a GDPR-compliant AI learning platform with European hosting options and no AI training on user content, it clears the privacy bar respondents set. It is an AI-native LMS and authoring platform built for the way L&D teams actually work.
See what your team could build
From idea to deployment in one connected workflow — try the platform L&D teams asked for.
Keywords: AI authoring tool for L&D, Simplify instructional design workflow, Secure AI authoring platform, AI-native LMS and authoring platform.
